Money Clarity

    Unyfy pricing: what is free, what Pro adds, who pays

    Most people read an app's price and stop there. The more useful question on any Unyfy pricing page is who else is paying, because a finance app that costs you nothing is being paid by someone, and that someone shapes what the app puts in front of you. Here the answer is disclosed. Lenders and card issuers pay a commission when you take a loan or a card through the app, discounted vouchers carry a margin, and Pro costs ₹99 a month. The part that finds money, the diagnosis, is free and is not held back until you accept a recommendation.

    That arrangement carries its own test. An app paid on loans has a reason to show you a loan, so the check that matters is whether it will tell you not to switch, in rupees, when the fee eats the saving. Below are three loan cases where the honest answer is yes once and no twice, and the rate gap under which a switch on a 30-month loan loses money.

    Then Pro, priced without flattery. ₹1,188 a year is less than one forgotten ₹179 mandate saves in twelve months, and on Pro the Subscriptions list is where a charge like that shows up, with its amount and payment days. Pro still has to earn its price on the view of next month, and for some households that is worth nothing at all.

    Last reviewed 2026-09-28

    Unyfy pricing: the free tier and Pro

    The technique

    Price the paid tier by what it adds, not by what the app finds

    Subscription pages tend to list everything an app does beside the paid plan, so the price looks small against the total. The fair comparison is narrower: what the paid tier does that the free tier does not, priced against what that difference saves or prevents in your own accounts.

    The free tier is the diagnosis. It reads bank and card transaction emails and, on Android, transactional SMS, so there is nothing to type in. From those it flags a loan priced above what the same borrower would be offered today and says whether switching is worth it once the fee is paid. It matches your category spending against 605 Indian credit cards from 32 issuers, filtered by income. And it opens a voucher store. None of it waits for you to take a product.

    Pro costs ₹99 a month: ₹1,188 a year, ₹2,376 over two years, ₹3,564 over three. The addition confirmed for this page is the forward view. The Fixed Expenses screen on Pro predicts what the coming month is already committed to, the EMIs, SIPs, rent, bills, subscriptions and card bill, with what is paid and what is left so far this month, and its Subscriptions list shows each recurring subscription with its amount and whether it is due or paid. On the free tier, that screen shows as Unlock Fixed Expenses. The plan screen inside the app lists what Pro includes on the day you subscribe. Judge it on that list and against your own accounts, not on how long the list is.

    What it doesFreePro, ₹99 a month
    Subscriptions list with Due or Paid status (Fixed Expenses)NoYes
    Loan priced above today's offer, with the after-fee answerYesYes
    Cards matched to your category spendingYesYes
    Voucher storeYesYes
    Next month's committed outflows predicted (fixed expenses)NoYes
    Ask Unyfy, the AI assistantFree to tryUnlimited, with voice
    Financial health reportNoYes
    Voucher discountStandardHigher, up to 30% on some brands
    Transaction history scanned6 months12 to 24 months
    Credit score insightsNoMonthly
    Trips and events, investments viewYesYes
    Cost for a year₹0₹1,188
    Only inclusions confirmed for this page are shown. Pro's full and current contents are on the in-app plan screen and can change.
    • ₹99 a month is about ₹3.25 a day, which is how subscriptions are usually sold and why they are easy to keep paying. Price it by the year, ₹1,188, and ask what one year of it has to find or prevent
    • Spending, income, card and loan views are free, so the sensible order is to use them first and decide on Pro afterwards, with your own findings in hand rather than a feature list
    • For what the app does beyond price: the page on what it is adds up one household's year in a single figure, the personal finance app page scores any app on five jobs, and the AI assistant page covers asking questions of your own transactions

    How finance apps make money: three models

    The technique

    Find the payer, then find the pull

    Every revenue model pulls an app toward something. Paid by advertisers, it is pulled toward your attention; paid by lenders, toward your next loan; paid by you, toward looking worth the fee each month. None is neutral, and a pull that is disclosed is far easier to check than one that is not.

    Finance apps are paid in three broad ways, and many mix them. The payer tells you where the conflict sits, and there is one in every model.

    Free with advertising means the product being sold is your attention and, often, what the app can infer about you from your money. Free with lending commissions means a bank or NBFC pays the app when you take its loan or card; the rate and fee are set by the lender, and the conflict is in which offer gets shown and how. A subscription makes you the customer, and the conflict is quieter: the app has a reason to look busy, adding things that justify renewal rather than things that save you money.

    ModelWho paysThe pullThe question to ask
    Free, advertisingAdvertisersYour time and your dataWhat is shared, with whom, and can I see it?
    Free, lending commissionsLenders and card issuersYour next loan or cardWill it ever tell me not to take one?
    SubscriptionYouRenewalWhat does the paid tier do that the free one does not?
    MixedLenders, merchants and youAll three, if disclosedIs the diagnosis free before any offer?
    General models, not a description of any named app. Most apps state their revenue sources in their terms or on a pricing page; if you cannot find them, that is an answer too.
    • Whoever referred you, what you pay is the rate and the processing fee in the sanction letter. Compare those against the loan you have now; the referral arrangement does not change the arithmetic you should run on it
    • Advertising is the model to question hardest in personal finance, because the most valuable thing an advertiser can buy from a money app is a list of people who are short this month
    • A subscription on its own does not remove the conflict. It moves it from what you are sold to whether you keep paying, which is why Pro is priced below as its own decision

    How the app earns: commissions and vouchers

    Three sources, all disclosed. When you take a personal loan, a consolidation loan or a credit card through the app, the bank, NBFC or card issuer pays a commission. Loan and consolidation offers come from 15+ banks and NBFCs. Before any application, the eligibility check pulls your Equifax credit report as a soft enquiry, which does not affect your score, and shows the score with the accounts behind it, overdue, settled or written-off ones included. Only the one lender you choose to apply with runs a hard enquiry. When you buy a discounted merchant voucher, the app earns a margin on the sale. And Pro is ₹99 a month.

    The voucher side is the easiest to price for yourself. The discount is typically around 7.5 percent and varies by brand; it is not fixed and not promised. On ₹3,000 a month spent at brands where you would shop anyway, that is ₹225 a month and ₹2,700 a year, 2.27 times what Pro costs, from the free voucher store. A single ₹2,000 voucher at that discount saves ₹150. The comparison that matters to you is the voucher price against the price at the till; the margin is the other side of that trade.

    The card side deserves the same scrutiny as a loan. Matching runs across 605 cards from 32 issuers against what you actually spend by category, and it is filtered by income, so it does not show cards whose income criteria you do not meet. The issuer pays when you take a card, which is why the useful question is whether the matching ever tells you that the card you already hold is the right one.

    • None of the three sources needs the app to move your money. It holds no bank password and no UPI PIN; a voucher, or anything else bought in the app, is a payment you authorise yourself
    • The soft enquiry matters more than it looks. Checking eligibility with several lenders directly can leave several hard enquiries on your report in a short span; here only the lender you pick adds one

    Why the diagnosis is not gated behind an offer

    The technique

    A finding shown only beside a product is a sales script

    If an app shows you an overpriced loan only alongside the loan it wants to sell, you cannot tell whether the finding came first or the offer did. A diagnosis given free, before any offer, and allowed to end in 'do not switch' is the only kind an app paid on commission can be trusted with.

    Take a ₹3 lakh personal loan with 30 months left at an illustrative 16 percent. An offer arrives at an illustrative 12.5 percent with a 2 percent processing fee, which is ₹7,080 once 18 percent GST is added. The EMI falls by ₹504, from ₹12,199 to ₹11,695. Interest over the remaining term falls from ₹65,959 to ₹50,860, and after the fee the switch is ₹8,019 ahead. Now change one thing at a time and watch the answer turn.

    This is the reason the diagnosis is free and not gated behind a recommendation. If the only way to learn that the second and third switches below lose money were to accept an offer first, the app would be selling, not diagnosing.

    CaseInterest savedFee with GSTAfter the fee
    ₹3 lakh, 30 months, 16% to 12.5%₹15,099₹7,080₹8,019 ahead
    ₹3 lakh, 30 months, 13.5% to 12.5%₹4,276₹7,080₹2,804 behind
    ₹1 lakh, 10 months, 16% to 12.5%₹1,661₹2,360₹699 behind
    Reducing-balance EMI on the outstanding balance, 2 percent processing fee plus 18 percent GST, no foreclosure charge on the old loan assumed. Rates are illustrative, not quotes; your sanction letter sets the real ones.
    • An app paid on loans earns on all three switches if you take them. Only the first saves you money. An honest diagnosis says so, and says it before you apply rather than after
    • On this ₹3 lakh loan with 30 months left, any rate gap under about 1.63 points loses money after a 2 percent fee. A one-point cut makes a headline, not a saving
    • Short remaining tenure sinks the case even at a wide gap. With 10 months left on ₹1 lakh, 3.5 points of rate saves ₹1,661 and the fee costs ₹2,360
    • A foreclosure charge on the old loan makes every row worse. Read it in your loan agreement before you count any saving

    Pro's ₹1,188 a year against one finding

    The technique

    Do not pay for a finding the free tier already made

    A forgotten mandate is the easiest way to make any subscription look cheap: one ₹179 debit found, and a ₹99 plan appears to pay for itself. But if the free tier found the mandate, Pro did not, and the comparison credits the paid plan with work that cost nothing.

    Take a ₹179 monthly mandate that kept charging for 7 months after you stopped using the service. It has already taken ₹1,253, which does not come back by cancelling. Stopped now, it saves ₹2,148 over the next year: 1.81 times Pro's ₹1,188, or 21.7 months of Pro. A ₹49 mandate saves ₹588 a year, ₹600 short of Pro. The break-even is plain: a finding worth ₹99 a month pays for Pro on its own.

    On Pro, a charge like either one shows up in the Fixed Expenses Subscriptions list, with its amount, whether this month's payment is due or paid, how often it is paid and its past months' payments. The loan above is a different case: the ₹8,019 switch comes from the loan check, not from Pro, so although it is 6.75 times Pro's yearly price, none of it is Pro's to claim.

    One forgotten mandate, priced
    Mandate, per month
    ₹179
    Already charged over 7 months
    ₹1,253
    Saved over the next 12 months by cancelling
    ₹2,148
    Pro for a year
    ₹1,188
    Mandate saving less Pro
    ₹960

    Illustrative. The ₹960 is a real gain from Pro only if Pro, not the free tier, was what found the mandate.

    • Cancel at the source. A UPI AutoPay mandate is revoked in the UPI app that set it up and a NACH mandate through your bank; stopping use of a service does not stop its debit
    • Treat what has already gone as sunk. The ₹1,253 is an argument for looking sooner next time, not for paying more now

    What Pro has to earn: the month ahead

    The technique

    Value a forecast by the borrowing it prevents

    Knowing next month's committed outflows is worth money only when a month would otherwise go short without warning and the gap ends up on a card. Price that card month and you have the ceiling on what a forecast can be worth to you.

    The case for Pro rests on the forward view. Suppose an annual ₹36,000 premium lands in a month that has ₹16,000 of room after the usual EMIs and bills. The month is ₹20,000 short. If that ₹20,000 of the card bill is carried into the next cycle, at an illustrative 3.5 percent a month plus 18 percent GST on the interest, 4.13 percent a month in effect, it costs about ₹826. Two such months in a year cost ₹1,652, which is ₹464 more than Pro. One costs ₹362 less than Pro.

    So the break-even is roughly ₹28,765 of shortfall carried on a card for one month a year, or 1.44 of those ₹20,000 months. A cycle full of lumpy payments you tend to forget, annual premiums, school fees, a yearly renewal, crosses that line without trying. A month that looks the same as the last one never does.

    One thing the forward view is not is a reminder. The app sends no reminders; it shows the coming month's commitments when you open it. The value depends on looking, and on putting money in place before the debit.

    • The ₹826 understates the cost. Once a card balance is carried, interest usually runs from each transaction date and new purchases lose their interest-free period, so a short month costs more than one month's rate on the gap
    • A forecast does not create money. It moves the problem earlier, to when a SIP can be paused or a transfer delayed, instead of later, when the only tool left is the card
    • If the forward view is already in your head, because your committed month is rent, one EMI and a phone bill, it tells you nothing new and ₹1,188 buys nothing

    When Pro is not worth ₹99 a month

    Pro is the wrong purchase for more people than a pricing page usually admits. Three years of it with nothing found or prevented is ₹3,564. Run the free diagnosis first and skip Pro if one of these describes you.

    It earns its price in the opposite case: several EMIs and premiums on different cycles, annual payments that have caught you out before, or a record of short months ending up on a card. There, preventing about one and a half card-carried months a year covers it.

    • Your committed month is short and fixed: rent, one EMI and a phone bill, on the same dates every month. There is nothing for a forecast to find
    • You carry no card balance and hold a cushion larger than any single lumpy payment. A short month never reaches the card, so the ₹826 in the example is never paid
    • The free diagnosis came back clean: no loan above today's pricing, a card that already fits your spending. That is a good result, and it does not need a monthly fee to repeat it
    • Much of your money moves in cash or through accounts whose alerts never reach your email or SMS. The app reads those alerts; what it cannot see, it cannot forecast
    • You want someone to invest or manage money for you. The app gives no investment advice, makes no trades and cannot move money on its own

    How Unyfy helps you check what you are paying

    This page's question is what money is leaving without a decision, and whether a switch or a subscription actually changes that. Two capabilities answer it. The loan check flags a loan priced above what you would be offered today and shows, with the processing fee counted, whether switching ends ahead or behind, as in the three cases above. On Pro, the Fixed Expenses screen predicts next month's committed outflows, with what is paid and what is left so far this month, and its Subscriptions list shows each recurring subscription with its amount and whether it is due or paid; each one's detail shows how often it is paid, its usual payment days and its past months' payments.

    It works from bank and card transaction emails and, on Android, transactional SMS, with UPI handles matched to merchant names from a database of about 10,000 entries, and a debit seen in both channels is counted once. It never asks for your bank password or UPI PIN, and every payment is one you authorise. You cancel a mandate in the UPI app that set it up, or with your bank for NACH. Install Unyfy on Android, or use the web app at app.unyfy.co.in on an iPhone.

    Common questions

    Unyfy pricing: is it free, and what does Pro cost?

    The diagnosis is free: loans priced above what you would be offered today with the after-fee answer, card matching and the voucher store. Pro costs ₹99 a month, which is ₹1,188 a year, and adds the Fixed Expenses screen: a prediction of what the coming month is already committed to, with a Subscriptions list showing each recurring subscription's amount and whether it is due or paid. The in-app plan screen lists Pro's current contents; check them against your own accounts before you subscribe.

    How does a free finance app make money?

    Usually through advertising, commissions from lenders and card issuers, or a subscription, and often a mix. This one is paid a commission when you take a loan or card through it, earns a margin on discounted vouchers, and charges for Pro. The check for a commission model is whether it will tell you not to switch: on a ₹3 lakh loan with 30 months left, moving from 13.5 to 12.5 percent loses ₹2,804 after a ₹7,080 fee, and an honest diagnosis says so before you apply.

    Is the Pro subscription price worth it?

    Only if the forward view keeps roughly ₹28,765 a year of shortfall from being carried on a card for a month. A ₹20,000 short month carried at an illustrative 3.5 percent a month plus 18 percent GST costs about ₹826; two such months cost ₹1,652, which is ₹464 more than Pro's ₹1,188. If your committed month is short, fixed and never surprises you, Pro is not worth it, and three years of it with nothing prevented is ₹3,564.

    Should I buy Pro because the app found a forgotten mandate?

    Price it on what Pro adds. A ₹179 monthly mandate saves ₹2,148 a year once cancelled, 1.81 times Pro's price, and on Pro a recurring subscription like that shows in the Fixed Expenses Subscriptions list with its amount and whether it is due or paid. Cancel the mandate in the UPI app that set it up, or with your bank for a NACH mandate, and keep Pro if the view of next month's committed outflows is worth ₹99 a month to you.

    Does checking loan eligibility through the app affect my credit score?

    No. The eligibility check pulls your Equifax credit report as a soft enquiry, which does not affect the score, and shows the score with the accounts behind it, overdue, settled or written-off ones included, before any application. Offers come from 15+ banks and NBFCs. Only the one lender you choose to apply with runs a hard enquiry, so you do not collect several hard enquiries just to compare.

    Does a loan taken through the app cost more because it earns a commission?

    What you pay is the rate and the processing fee in the sanction letter, so compare those against your current loan with the fee counted and the remaining tenure stated honestly. On this page's example, a ₹3 lakh balance with 30 months left moving from 16 to 12.5 percent is ₹8,019 ahead after a ₹7,080 fee, while a ₹1 lakh balance with 10 months left loses ₹699 at the same rates. If the numbers say stay, stay.

    The diagnosis is free and comes before any offer. The app is paid by lenders and card issuers when you take a product, by a margin on vouchers, and by Pro at ₹99 a month, ₹1,188 a year. Judge the commission side by whether it will say no: on a ₹3 lakh loan with 30 months left, a 3.5-point cut is ₹8,019 ahead after the fee and a one-point cut is ₹2,804 behind. Judge Pro by what it adds, not by what the free tier finds: it pays when it keeps roughly ₹28,765 of shortfall a year off a card. Informational page, not financial advice. Plan contents, prices, rates, fees and offers are illustrative or can change; the in-app plan screen and your lender's sanction letter govern, not this page.

    Our Partners

    Banks and NBFCs we compare

    Unyfy compares offers from these lenders and earns a commission if you take one. The comparison is shown first, and it can tell you not to switch.

    HDFC Bank logo
    ICICI Bank logo
    Axis Bank
    State Bank of India logo
    IDFC First Bank logo
    Kotak Mahindra logo
    IndusInd Bank logo
    Yes Bank logo
    Bajaj Finserv logo
    Tata Capital logo